Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / Media & Music / Crash

Crash

23 posts · page 1 of 1

wkh
post #1
20 March 2006, 13:17 UTC#1
Ok so lastnight I went to a friends house and he was laughing about a movie called crash. I asked him what it was about and he said people get in cars, crash them, then fuck. The movie is about some underground fetish of people who get off on crashes. He said at one point of the movie a man walks into a room to find loads of dudes all wanking to a video tape of a crash


QUOTE
Since a road accident left him with serious facial and bodily scarring, a former 'TV scientist' has become obsessed by the marriage of motor car technology with what he sees as the `raw sexuality' of car-crash victims. The scientist, along with a crash victim he has recently befriended, sets about performing a series of sexual acts in a variety of motor vehicles, either with other crash victims or with prostitutes who they contort into the shape of trapped-corpses. Ultimately, the scientist craves a suicidal union of blood, semen and engine coolant, a union with which he becomes dangerously obsessed.



QUOTE
Based on the 1973 novel by J. G. Ballard. James and Catherine Ballard are a married couple whose sex life has been reduced to recounting tales of mutual infidelity to turn each other on. One night, James causes a head-on collision with a car carrying Dr. Helen Remington, killing her husband and severely injuring her and himself. Subsequent encounters with each other find that they are oddly sexually aroused by the danger of car accidents and potential accidents, and, with Catherine, soon fall in with a cult of car crash fetishists. The group is led by Vaughan, a former scientist twisted by his own disfigurement in an accident, and, as a result, a man obsessed with car crashes as a liberation of sexual energy. Vaughan inducts the Ballards and Dr. Remington into his surreal world of sex in the back seats of cars, re-enactments of famous car crashes (I.e. James Dean and Jayne Mansfield), viewing photos of accident victims and screenings of collision videos as pornography, and fender benders as mating rituals.



It sounds fucked up.... as anyone seen it?


The only trailer I could find
cIRca
post #2
20 March 2006, 13:21 UTC#2
"Ultimately, the scientist craves a suicidal union of blood, semen and engine coolant.."

Sounds like a fun movie. Image file not present in the recovered backup
WEAK
post #3
20 March 2006, 13:52 UTC#3
Ive never seen it, but I remember the previews. Its directed by David Cronenberg and some how he managed to get mainstream actors involved. It looks like the dumbest piece of shit ever.
neKa
post #4
20 March 2006, 14:01 UTC#4
imdb
wkh
post #5
20 March 2006, 14:20 UTC#5
QUOTE(neKa @ Mar 20 2006, 02:01 PM) [snapback]305783[/snapback]

imdb


WOW I never knew about IMDB what a great website.... Image file not present in the recovered backup
made
post #6
20 March 2006, 15:37 UTC#6
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 20 2006, 01:21 PM) [snapback]305774[/snapback]

"Ultimately, the scientist craves a suicidal union of blood, semen and engine coolant.."

Sounds like a fun movie. Image file not present in the recovered backup

Image file not present in the recovered backup
Tomm
post #7
20 March 2006, 15:38 UTC#7
People from my school have been handing this around all thinking it was awesome, maybe I should lend this.
AP Steve
post #8
20 March 2006, 16:44 UTC#8
wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you
wkh
post #9
20 March 2006, 17:08 UTC#9
QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 04:44 PM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you


have you seen it then?
cIRca
post #10
20 March 2006, 17:16 UTC#10
I wanna see this, someone rip it for me :happy:
Liam
post #11
20 March 2006, 17:31 UTC#11
not to be confused with the winner of the "best movie" oscar 2006.
AP Steve
post #12
20 March 2006, 17:39 UTC#12
I believe I must have confused it "with the winner of the "best movie" oscar 2006."
JohnBorDumB
post #13
20 March 2006, 17:40 UTC#13
QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.
lou komodo
post #14
20 March 2006, 17:45 UTC#14
QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Mar 20 2006, 05:40 PM) [snapback]305915[/snapback]

QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.

It's a different film, not the one with Sandra Bullock in. There are 2 separate films called crash.
JohnBorDumB
post #15
20 March 2006, 17:55 UTC#15
QUOTE(lou komodo @ Mar 20 2006, 12:45 PM) [snapback]305916[/snapback]

QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Mar 20 2006, 05:40 PM) [snapback]305915[/snapback]

QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.

It's a different film, not the one with Sandra Bullock in. There are 2 separate films called crash.


QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 12:39 PM) [snapback]305913[/snapback]

I believe I must have confused it "with the winner of the "best movie" oscar 2006."


Touché Ms. Komodo... Touché
wkh
post #16
20 March 2006, 17:56 UTC#16
QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Mar 20 2006, 05:40 PM) [snapback]305915[/snapback]

QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.


No your the moron, im talking about crach 1996 not 2004
neKa
post #17
20 March 2006, 17:57 UTC#17
QUOTE(wkh @ Mar 20 2006, 02:20 PM) [snapback]305785[/snapback]

QUOTE(neKa @ Mar 20 2006, 02:01 PM) [snapback]305783[/snapback]

imdb


WOW I never knew about IMDB what a great website.... Image file not present in the recovered backup


Yup, I doubt you knew about the exact link to the sub site that linked directly to the film you were talking about either ;)
WEAK
post #18
20 March 2006, 18:39 UTC#18
QUOTE(wkh @ Mar 20 2006, 05:56 PM) [snapback]305918[/snapback]

QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Mar 20 2006, 05:40 PM) [snapback]305915[/snapback]

QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.


No your the moron, im talking about crach 1996 not 2004


lol WKH is right, there are 2 completely different movies with the name Crash. You guys are thinking of the 2004 one with Sandra Bullock - which was a good movie IMO.
lou komodo
post #19
20 March 2006, 19:18 UTC#19
QUOTE(WEAK @ Mar 20 2006, 06:39 PM) [snapback]305943[/snapback]

QUOTE(wkh @ Mar 20 2006, 05:56 PM) [snapback]305918[/snapback]

QUOTE(JohnBorDumB @ Mar 20 2006, 05:40 PM) [snapback]305915[/snapback]

QUOTE(AP Steve @ Mar 20 2006, 11:44 AM) [snapback]305854[/snapback]

wow.. he gave you a pretty messed up description.. either hes never watched it or he was jsut screwing around with you

We have a winner...


The movie is definitely not like that at all... Your friend is a total moron.


No your the moron, im talking about crach 1996 not 2004


lol WKH is right, there are 2 completely different movies with the name Crash. You guys are thinking of the 2004 one with Sandra Bullock - which was a good movie IMO.

I swear I just said exactly that....did I forget to press post again...
Doyle
post #20
20 March 2006, 21:35 UTC#20
The movie is ok... I saw it ages ago. But I dont think most of you will like it... It is kinda slow moving and very much story based. I saw it again about 1yr ago and liked it much more the 2nd time.

But yeah its about people who just dont care anymore about there life and find a thrill in coming close to death.... Also I think they find a thrill in killing others or watching them suffer... but thats not talked about much in the film. Also theres the sex... which just makes the whole thing stranger.

Its nota movie to watch with laods of people... as I said its story based and you need to think the whole way though... and understand the people... which with a group of people is hard to do.
smack_daddy_j
post #21
20 March 2006, 21:43 UTC#21
I seen it it stars fellow montreal Elias koteas who is best known from playing casey jones in ninja turtles 1 and 3

its a fucked up movie but not very good pretty boring and just a bit disturbing

there are scenes where men fuck each other and shit they get turned on so much by car crashes they dont care who their fucking..

I dont recomend it its boring as fuck
cIRca
post #22
21 March 2006, 18:47 UTC#22
I just watched this film. It is all sex. And there is both gay and lesbian.

However the gay is more thorough. And I feel like I have gone crazy.

Damn this film. Damn it to hell.
FV Tyler
post #23
21 March 2006, 22:18 UTC#23
Yeah, I saw this on HBO...pretty weird. There's like a scene where they're all sitting on bleachers watching a burning car, and like...I dont really remember...nevermind. It was a good movie though....Besides the ghey secks.