Forum index / General Chat / Sick of this

Sick of this

81 posts · page 2 of 3

post #31
12 March 2006, 02:36 UTC#31
QUOTE(adEm @ Mar 12 2006, 01:01 AM) [snapback]301109[/snapback]

you've never contributed to anything tho, joe. everytime I've seen you post has been to talk about an album, or say shit about how something sucks.


Yeah I have to agree with Adem on this one. There are some people on HGF that dont seem to know how to connect with other people on a forum, and Joe is one of these people. I know it sounds gay but its true, some people just dont how to socialize via the internet.

and yeah there are 1 or 2 bad apples on the VIP list, and I'd remove them but I'm tired of being the 'mean admin'. I'll have Tomm take care of it Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #32
12 March 2006, 02:46 UTC#32
QUOTE(WEAK @ Mar 11 2006, 11:35 PM) [snapback]301069[/snapback]

QUOTE(DEX @ Mar 11 2006, 11:32 PM) [snapback]301066[/snapback]

O shit. Weak please give joe vip status cos I just dont think I can live with him not being on here.

Im begging you Weak!


Nope, but out of spite I'll give RAS his VIP membership that I promised him. Chris, you better contribute porn Image file not present in the recovered backup


Image file not present in the recovered backup Awesome, thanks man. I'll make sure to do that daily Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #33
12 March 2006, 04:02 UTC#33
cry me a river bitch
post #34
12 March 2006, 04:13 UTC#34
QUOTE(Rob764 @ Mar 12 2006, 12:55 AM) [snapback]301103[/snapback]

QUOTE(joe_thc @ Mar 11 2006, 05:37 PM) [snapback]300937[/snapback]

ok, ive been a member since last year, and still, I get treated like a noob. I PM'd weak to see if I can gt VIP status, and he doesnt respond. Brent tells me all this shit bout hgf but I have no clue what hes talking about, people seem to worhsip him. Im not jealous, I just think its gay how alot of peopel are gettting privledges, and I cant when ive been a mber for a year.

I hate to say it but I am leaving these forums. Goodbye.

heres an example of what im talking about


Adrian Rize -882 post/members since jan 05

d889 -40 post/member since nov 05



and then theres me - 2403 post, member since may 05


Lol thank God you're going, you whiny bitch.

"BOOHOO! I have a larger post count, therefore must be a better member!".
Idiot.

QUOTE(Dan Avery @ Mar 12 2006, 01:19 AM) [snapback]301087[/snapback]

VIP was a fucking stupid idea. What the fuck is to be spoken privatly about anyway..jesus christ.


It's obviously an idea that goes over your head, fat boy. It's mainly for stuff that people don't want guests seeing.

Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #35
12 March 2006, 04:36 UTC#35
bai Joe...see you in July
post #36
12 March 2006, 04:44 UTC#36
bye bye joe....


*I fondly remember being promised vip... haha....




I don't care, I just wish there were more interesting topics as of late.
post #37
12 March 2006, 06:41 UTC#37
ive never heard of joe thc anyway.
post #38
12 March 2006, 06:50 UTC#38
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Mar 12 2006, 06:41 AM) [snapback]301194[/snapback]

ive never heard of joe thc anyway.

how can you not know who joe thc is???? he's the guy with the huuuuuuuuuge...

























...post count.
post #39
12 March 2006, 07:39 UTC#39
rofl.

LOL did he think he was gonna get sympathy by creating this? or be made a vip he had to knwo everyone would make fun of him. I mean shit before there was no vip then what would you have quit for?

P.s. if a year from now your still actively posting and friends with people on here then maybe you can say a few words but BITCH PLEASE.
post #41
12 March 2006, 07:49 UTC#41
QUOTE(itsallinthehips @ Mar 12 2006, 07:46 AM) [snapback]301205[/snapback]

K.


msn plz.
post #42
12 March 2006, 08:09 UTC#42
People that bitch and leave because of such trivial things are just proving why they weren't put into the VIP to begin with.
post #43
12 March 2006, 08:24 UTC#43
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 08:09 AM) [snapback]301219[/snapback]

People that bitch and leave because of such trivial things are just proving why they weren't put into the VIP to begin with.


well said
post #44
12 March 2006, 09:27 UTC#44
You don't see me acting like a two year old, and I've been here longer than most of yee too =]
post #45
12 March 2006, 10:11 UTC#45
QUOTE(neKa @ Mar 11 2006, 11:50 PM) [snapback]301074[/snapback]

I've been trying to, but it keeps cutting out and I can't resume the file to finish it off cause Karls server won't allow resuming files.

Ah bastard, I thought my FTP client was just fucking up, I installed so many other ones trying to get round the problem.
post #46
12 March 2006, 10:23 UTC#46
QUOTE(Joe. @ Mar 11 2006, 05:06 PM) [snapback]300947[/snapback]

Why do people keep making these pointless threads, do you want sympathy? Maybe you don't contribute enough desent stuff? maybe your posts are irrelevant? Post number don't mean shit, you could have just spammed 2000, stop whinning.

cIRca???

He's a VIP
post #47
12 March 2006, 10:24 UTC#47
I am considered trusted.
post #48
12 March 2006, 10:26 UTC#48
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not
post #49
12 March 2006, 10:31 UTC#49
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,
post #50
12 March 2006, 10:34 UTC#50
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

Is this just because you feel you should be a VIP? You can either leave HGF like the others before you, or appeal. Stop trying to make an example out of me because I don't care about my post count. It can be deleted like Wiburs was for all I care.
post #51
12 March 2006, 10:35 UTC#51
QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]301259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,

There should be a way of testing whether or not someone's trustworthy

It shouldn.t just be judged on the opinions of the Admins
post #52
12 March 2006, 10:36 UTC#52
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]301259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,

There should be a way of testing whether or not someone's trustworthy

It shouldn.t just be judged on the opinions of the Admins


well ultimatly they run the site and have the final say over whats going on... What do you want a tickle trustworthy test or something?
post #53
12 March 2006, 10:39 UTC#53
QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:36 AM) [snapback]301265[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]301259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,

There should be a way of testing whether or not someone's trustworthy

It shouldn.t just be judged on the opinions of the Admins


well ultimatly they run the site and have the final say over whats going on... What do you want a tickle trustworthy test or something?

Instead of being a bitch about it take it seriously.

It's not you I'm talking to, its the Members who could offer something worthwhile to the VIP forums and the Admins who arn't letting it happen

EDIT: And instead of testing whether or not someones trustworthy, there should be a series of criteria that, if fulfilled, earns the member VIP status
post #54
12 March 2006, 10:40 UTC#54
Dude all you would bring is a bad attitude.
post #55
12 March 2006, 10:41 UTC#55
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:40 AM) [snapback]301267[/snapback]

Dude all you would bring is a bad attitude.

Explain.
post #56
12 March 2006, 10:43 UTC#56
The entire page of this thread, you have done nothing but bitch.
post #57
12 March 2006, 10:44 UTC#57
QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:39 AM) [snapback]301266[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:36 AM) [snapback]301265[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]301259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,

There should be a way of testing whether or not someone's trustworthy

It shouldn.t just be judged on the opinions of the Admins


well ultimatly they run the site and have the final say over whats going on... What do you want a tickle trustworthy test or something?

Instead of being a bitch about it take it seriously.

It's not you I'm talking to, its the Members who could offer something worthwhile to the VIP forums and the Admins who arn't letting it happen

EDIT: And instead of testing whether or not someones trustworthy, there should be a series of criteria that, if fulfilled, earns the member VIP status

there is a critea and thats down to wether the admin team are happy with you being in there...

how am I not taking it seriously I'm looking at it in a sensible manner, how else would we decide who;'s trustworthy other than having the people who run the site, are here the most, read all the posts, and deal with all the shit some people throw at them?

when you come up with a better idea let me know...

you say about criteria and that, who would decide if someone fits that criteria? the admins dumbass! which is pretty much what goes on now when deciding who gets into it. In all honestly I like it but it's far less a big deal than people who aren't in it make it out to be...
post #58
12 March 2006, 10:49 UTC#58
QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:43 AM) [snapback]301269[/snapback]

The entire page of this thread, you have done nothing but bitch.

I'm not bitching I'm just standing up for the people who deserve VIP status.

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:44 AM) [snapback]301270[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:39 AM) [snapback]301266[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:36 AM) [snapback]301265[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:35 AM) [snapback]301263[/snapback]

QUOTE(chorus @ Mar 12 2006, 10:31 AM) [snapback]301259[/snapback]

QUOTE(pattyt18 @ Mar 12 2006, 10:26 AM) [snapback]301255[/snapback]

QUOTE(cIRca @ Mar 12 2006, 10:24 AM) [snapback]301252[/snapback]

I am considered trusted.

And how does anyone really know if someone can be trusted or not?

Being a VIP isnt a goal, it's just to do with whether or not the Admins like you or not

It's got nout to do with post count so going' on about tom's post count is kinda pointless. Not down to wether the admins like you or not but wether they deem you trustworthy or not. Theres probably some members on there that the admin team don't like but, because they can offer stuff there and are trusted not to bring it up outside or anything like that, have decided to let in,

There should be a way of testing whether or not someone's trustworthy

It shouldn.t just be judged on the opinions of the Admins


well ultimatly they run the site and have the final say over whats going on... What do you want a tickle trustworthy test or something?

Instead of being a bitch about it take it seriously.

It's not you I'm talking to, its the Members who could offer something worthwhile to the VIP forums and the Admins who arn't letting it happen

EDIT: And instead of testing whether or not someones trustworthy, there should be a series of criteria that, if fulfilled, earns the member VIP status

there is a critea and thats down to wether the admin team are happy with you being in there...

how am I not taking it seriously I'm looking at it in a sensible manner, how else would we decide who;'s trustworthy other than having the people who run the site, are here the most, read all the posts, and deal with all the shit some people throw at them?

when you come up with a better idea let me know...

you say about criteria and that, who would decide if someone fits that criteria? the admins dumbass! which is pretty much what goes on now when deciding who gets into it. In all honestly I like it but it's far less a big deal than people who aren't in it make it out to be...

QUOTE
What do you want a tickle trustworthy test or something?

Thats how you're not taking it seriously

And the criteria would be devised by everyone, and yes the admins would decide it, but the point of it would that anyone could decide it if they wanted to and be fair about it
post #59
12 March 2006, 10:51 UTC#59
And you really think that would work dude, morons like happyjack and the like will just fuck up if they got any input into it, and that tickle thing wasn't being serious about you rather than the whole issue, the current system is probably the fairest and less likely to fuck up so just let it die.
post #60
12 March 2006, 10:53 UTC#60
Guys I really dont notice alot of difference between the content in the vip lounge and the normal forums, its just there if someone needs privacy from the media or so on.

Im closing this thread again as I can see arguements brewing

*closed*