Forum index / Cameras / Does anyone know anything about this Camera?

Does anyone know anything about this Camera?

28 posts · page 1 of 1

post #2
04 March 2006, 22:58 UTC#2
He's probably going to advise you not to get it because it was just discontinued.
post #3
04 March 2006, 22:59 UTC#3
Louzy Hero got that camera a few weeks ago, it got seized by the police the first time we took it out.

I was really impressed by it, it had a real nice feel to the way it filmed. I can't explain it, it just filmed with a professional look, seemed kinda like widescreen.

Never got a chance to capture any footage to my PC though...I'd post a screenshot overwise :(
post #4
04 March 2006, 23:03 UTC#4
QUOTE
Louzy Hero got that camera a few weeks ago, it got seized by the police the first time we took it out.


That sucks. Are you gonna get it back?

post #5
04 March 2006, 23:05 UTC#5
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Mar 4 2006, 11:03 PM) [snapback]297512[/snapback]

QUOTE
Louzy Hero got that camera a few weeks ago, it got seized by the police the first time we took it out.


That sucks. Are you gonna get it back?

Sometime after May hopefully...Thats when we got our hearings.

I have the sudden urge to film now too, really sucks. They took my GL2 aswell.
post #6
04 March 2006, 23:11 UTC#6
Hey Elliot. That camera was just recently discontinued and replaced by a new camere called the HC3. You can read the article about it here - http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Sony-...-Camcorder-.htm

If you really want a HD camera but are on a tight budget, then the HC3 would be an obvious choice because it's the least expensive HD camera out there. The HC3 is also $300 cheaper than the HC1.

However, if High Definition doesnt me that much to you, than by all means stay away from the HC3 and HC1. They're only 1CCD and by far the most expensive consumer cameras on the market.

post #7
04 March 2006, 23:14 UTC#7
Would a HD HC1 pump out a better picture than a 3CCD budget for around the same price?

So you think I should wait for the HC3? Is it the same camera in a different shell or different cam all together?
post #8
04 March 2006, 23:20 UTC#8
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Mar 4 2006, 11:14 PM) [snapback]297531[/snapback]

Would a HD HC1 pump out a better picture than a 3CCD budget for around the same price?

So you think I should wait for the HC3? Is it the same camera in a different shell or different cam all together?


I think the main changes between the HC1 and the HC3 are mainly cosmetic. They did get rid of some of its manual features, but Im pretty sure the picture quality is just as good.

Its hard to say if the HC1 would have better picture quality than a 3CCD SD camcorder in the same price range. It's a good question, but I've never used an HD camera so I really couldnt say.
post #10
04 March 2006, 23:23 UTC#10
THC, do you get a discount because your mom works for Sony?
post #11
04 March 2006, 23:24 UTC#11
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Mar 4 2006, 06:23 PM) [snapback]297538[/snapback]

THC, do you get a discount because your mom works for Sony?

yes
post #12
04 March 2006, 23:25 UTC#12
I'm jealous.
post #13
04 March 2006, 23:30 UTC#13
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Mar 4 2006, 11:25 PM) [snapback]297540[/snapback]

I'm jealous.

post #14
04 March 2006, 23:31 UTC#14
Yeah, the FX1 fucking pwns.

How much discount can you get on it?

A mate is a soundy for TV and he trying to convince me to get it just because of the XLR inputs.
post #15
04 March 2006, 23:34 UTC#15
QUOTE(THC @ Mar 4 2006, 06:24 PM) [snapback]297539[/snapback]

QUOTE(Wilbur @ Mar 4 2006, 06:23 PM) [snapback]297538[/snapback]

THC, do you get a discount because your mom works for Sony?

yes


7k is still so much. im gonna save up like 1700$ and get the panasonic dvc30 I think
post #16
04 March 2006, 23:43 UTC#16
QUOTE(ELLIOT @ Mar 4 2006, 06:31 PM) [snapback]297543[/snapback]

Yeah, the FX1 fucking pwns.

How much discount can you get on it?

A mate is a soundy for TV and he trying to convince me to get it just because of the XLR inputs.

FX1 = No XLR
Z1U = 2 XLR


The fx1 got amasing reviews but everyone said the one downfall is no xlr inputs but the z1u picks up where the fx1 left off... even tho its like 3 grand more it is still sooo worth it..
post #17
04 March 2006, 23:55 UTC#17
In the prosumer HD market, I think Sony is completely behind. If I was going to pump 5+ grand into an HD camera, it would be for the purpose of creating an indie film and I'd probally wanna have the option to convert to film.

JVC, Panasonic, and Canon all have superior HD cameras in my opinion, and a lot of the reviews I've read agree.

For a little more than Z1U, you could get the JVC HD100. It offers a variable frame rate and interchangable lens, 2 awesome features the Z1U lacks.

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.prohd.co.uk/files/page1_1.jpg

Then there is the Panasonic HVX200, which also has a variable frame rate

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.camcorderinfo.com/images/upload/Image/Panasonic/SDR-S100/HVX200-vanity(1).jpg

Then there is the Canon XL-H1 which just has everything you every would ever need..

External image not preserved — inspect source: http://www.jafaphotography.com/images/camcorder/xl-h1_canon.jpg

I'm really on the JVC HD100...it's definitely the camera I'll be looking into when Im ready to updrade to HD.
post #18
05 March 2006, 00:03 UTC#18
uhh.. the z1u has 24p...
post #19
05 March 2006, 00:04 UTC#19
The XLH1 looks awesome.
post #20
05 March 2006, 00:15 UTC#20
QUOTE(THC @ Mar 5 2006, 12:03 AM) [snapback]297558[/snapback]

uhh.. the z1u has 24p...


Nah, it's a mock 24p. My DVC30 does something like it as well.

QUOTE
Instead of adding a true 24p or 30p mode, Sony has put in a 24 and 30 frame "Cineframe" mode. While the 24 Cineframe "look" is interesting, it is definitely not progressive. The HVR-Z1U processor does electronically process the 60i image so that it appears to look like 24p, but the cadence is set up electronically, so you can’t reverse telecine the material to get a pure 24p video file.
post #21
05 March 2006, 00:18 UTC#21
weak you have the panasonic dvc30?
post #22
05 March 2006, 07:00 UTC#22
QUOTE(CullenFF @ Mar 5 2006, 12:18 AM) [snapback]297566[/snapback]

weak you have the panasonic dvc30?


yes
post #23
05 March 2006, 17:47 UTC#23
Well thats the one im saving up to get do you like it??
post #24
05 March 2006, 18:00 UTC#24
Doesn't the canon gl2 have progessive movie mode that takes 30 real frames per second instead of interlaced video?

I remember that being a reason why people chose it over the vx, although I'd take a vx for it's low light capabilities.
post #25
05 March 2006, 19:04 UTC#25
these camera discussions make me wet.

some please tell me what the "xlr inputs" are all about.
post #26
05 March 2006, 19:13 UTC#26
Professional audio inputs basically.
post #27
04 April 2006, 05:24 UTC#27
That is the cam I am getting when my phat life guard pay check comes in.