Forum index / Video Releases / New Rejected Mix-Up

New Rejected Mix-Up

19 posts · page 1 of 1

post #1
22 February 2006, 05:59 UTC#1
CLICKY!

2:20Min 8MB

ya we edited this for our DVD but I decided to release it just for HGF (cause I love u so much)

some tagging and other random acts of vandalism.

enjoy.
post #2
22 February 2006, 06:49 UTC#2
downloading now..

EDIT: I liked the video on a whole, little things that annoyed me where:
Some places were overedited so much that I couldnt actually see what was happening.
ScrEMO music doesnt really fit the type of clip your trying to potray.

But as I said I liked it on a whole.
Rize rating: 6.5/10
post #3
22 February 2006, 09:17 UTC#3
Didn't really like it, music didn't fit at all, editing was uneven, but some of it could've been quite good. Graff was toy, some of the vandalism was pretty cool, but hard to see. I don't know why you bother showing your friends smoking buds, boring to watch; and could be a bitch if the vid got into the wrong hands.
Basically, this vid could be a lot better, the music basically made it hard to watch for me.
post #4
22 February 2006, 09:35 UTC#4
I agree what others said the music didnt go with that video and I didnt know what was happening for most parts. I fink if thats for your dvd you should improve it but its up to you obviously. That was A.F.I though rite? what song was it?
post #5
22 February 2006, 09:54 UTC#5
I like AFI and I like vanalism, but somehow that vid seemed a bit mediocre.

I still enjoyed though, I've seen a few clips before, but the rest looked pretty cool.

I liked the rejected tags in quick succesion, even though they are pretty toy.

Alright clip... work on your editing a bit better, and It would have been much more enjoyable.
post #6
22 February 2006, 09:56 UTC#6
nice)) like clip... ))
post #7
22 February 2006, 14:31 UTC#7
I cant say I liked it, at all man :(
It just seemed to me, like, you just edited it in parts. Like edit the first 10secs, then the next 10secs seperately, and just put them together at the end. Didn't flow very well at all at one point we had two clips fading with eachother then all of a sudden up pops some other random transition effect, im not sure what it was.. but it just didnt flow, I can see what you where trying to do, but I dont think you pulled it off very well.

I think you should maybe re-edit it again, if its going in your DVD.
It didn't flow,
The music felt out of place; it was like you edited the parts, then put the music over the top.. not good,
I've seen a few videos on here where its been really dark, but I've been able to watch them fine, althouh I just couldn't get into yours, the content looked alright.. if I could see it :(

But from what I saw, and from what I've seen from you before, it looks like you have some nice footage, more is prolly being saved for the DVD??

Well I would suggest re-editing it though, but dont take anything of what I said in an offensive way, just as some tips :P
Thanks.
post #8
22 February 2006, 14:34 UTC#8
sorry to say man but the vid was just poo
post #9
22 February 2006, 15:04 UTC#9
QUOTE
vandalism,tagging,pot,smashing,mischief

I guess someone doesn't care eventhough the forums are being monitored :happy:
Downloading now
post #10
22 February 2006, 15:17 UTC#10
eh, It was alright I guess.

Music did NOT fit in one bit though.

The content was alright but it was kind of hard understand what was going on in some parts cause of the camera quality + being compressed.

It was alright though. Did you get caught doing any of these things?
post #11
22 February 2006, 15:44 UTC#11
thought it was alrite, lot of effort in it, not edited together all that well though. could have looked a lot better with better editing.
post #12
22 February 2006, 15:44 UTC#12
Seemed like it was edited to fit another song..
post #13
22 February 2006, 16:30 UTC#13
I didn't like it, editing was mediocre and footage wasnt anything special.

I'm not really one to comment on graffiti but your tags sucked. I guess I wasnt entertained.
post #14
22 February 2006, 16:41 UTC#14
Some clips were way too dark, song sucked and that might be the reason why the editing sucked too. Some footage looked good but there was alot of things that ruined this mix up
post #15
22 February 2006, 17:18 UTC#15
QUOTE(Adrian Rize @ Feb 22 2006, 06:49 AM) [snapback]289028[/snapback]

ScrEMO music doesnt really fit the type of clip your trying to potray.


lol that wasn't screamo. That was the 'justin timberlake' song from AFI

"just in tim ber lake" Image file not present in the recovered backup
post #16
22 February 2006, 17:26 UTC#16
1) Do you really want the words "vandalism,tagging,pot,smashing,mischief" to be posted around so google.bot can pick it up... (or even the cops that are looking around here anyway)

2) smashing car windows was far from fucking cool. Some one smash our car window 2 nights ago and its cost £70 to fix and when I find the fuckers who did it (no joke) they are spending the nights in the woods tied up.
post #17
22 February 2006, 17:28 UTC#17
I didn't really like the clip, but with the right editting the footage would stand out more, but it kinda just breezed over me and I didn't really take in what was happening.
post #18
22 February 2006, 17:29 UTC#18
QUOTE(wkh @ Feb 22 2006, 05:26 PM) [snapback]289213[/snapback]

2) smashing car windows was far from fucking cool. Some one smash our car window 2 nights ago and its cost £70 to fix and when I find the fuckers who did it (no joke) they are spending the nights in the woods tied up.

True.

The only time I would really condone fucking up people's property is if its for revenge.
post #19
22 February 2006, 17:30 UTC#19
QUOTE(exoh @ Feb 22 2006, 05:29 PM) [snapback]289217[/snapback]

The only time I would really condone fucking up people's property is if its for revenge.


yup