Forum index / General Chat / American govnerment liasing internet

American govnerment liasing internet

35 posts · page 1 of 2

post #1
11 January 2006, 22:12 UTC#1
What's your uptake on this? The link WKH posted to dumpalink reminded me of this.

A new law has been passed where you have to specify your real identity and name when participating in any argument on the internet. I don't understand this new legislation. What's your uptake on it?
post #3
11 January 2006, 22:17 UTC#3
QUOTE(funk master steven @ Jan 11 2006, 11:12 PM) [snapback]264261[/snapback]

Link?



I can't find the BBC link I had earlier, I'll look in a few mins.
post #4
11 January 2006, 22:18 UTC#4
I have no idea how they will enforce this.


I'm Robert Anthoney Joyce by the way. I am 17 years of age and am on no sex offenders registers.












Yet.
post #5
11 January 2006, 22:21 UTC#5
This is the most retarded law I've ever heard of, like rob said, how could they enforce it, and people would say it wasn't an argument and all that shit. Who made this crap up?
post #6
11 January 2006, 22:24 UTC#6
Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.
post #7
11 January 2006, 22:26 UTC#7
QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.


Your wrong, there is a group of Americans known as the "Anti-Patriots"....I have already said to much.
post #8
11 January 2006, 22:26 UTC#8
QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?
post #9
11 January 2006, 22:27 UTC#9
QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264279[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?


Erm the internet is not American.
post #10
11 January 2006, 22:29 UTC#10
I know...so does his rule apply to everyone or what? I dont understand how it could work.
post #11
11 January 2006, 22:29 UTC#11
QUOTE(funk master steven @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264278[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.


Your wrong, there is a group of Americans known as the "Anti-Patriots"....I have already said to much.



If I was American I'd be doing my part. Patriosim is good in some aspects, but your govnerment is taking the piss with this.

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264279[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?


Well, it's supposedly supposed to be global. I doubt they can enforce this in Europe though as the EU would never allow all this patriotic crap over here.

I don't care for this law much, as it doesn't affect me in the slightest. The concept of it just really annoys me.
post #12
11 January 2006, 22:30 UTC#12
QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:29 PM) [snapback]264281[/snapback]

I know...so does his rule apply to everyone or what? I dont understand how it could work.

Would only apply for Americans. George Bush doesn't rule the world, despite what he might think.
post #13
11 January 2006, 22:33 UTC#13
QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 11:27 PM) [snapback]264280[/snapback]

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264279[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?


Erm the internet is not American.



Actually America does categorically own root records for domains. However, no one really owns the internet, the internet is basically a massive network.
post #14
11 January 2006, 22:33 UTC#14
QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 10:30 PM) [snapback]264283[/snapback]

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:29 PM) [snapback]264281[/snapback]

I know...so does his rule apply to everyone or what? I dont understand how it could work.

Would only apply for Americans. George Bush doesn't rule the world, despite what he might think.


But like how would it work.

man 1 : dude you got your head so far up your ass, and on that note my name is man 1 and live in al's fictisiouse mind
man 2: dude your a dumbass and deserve an ass kicking, man 2 al's fictisiouse mind

post #15
11 January 2006, 22:35 UTC#15
QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 11:33 PM) [snapback]264284[/snapback]

QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 11:27 PM) [snapback]264280[/snapback]

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264279[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?


Erm the internet is not American.



Actually America does categorically own root records for domains. However, no one really owns the internet, the internet is basically a massive network.


The internet was born in Sweden.

And I know, there'd be no way of enforcing it. It's stupid. It's moronic. It's George Bush.
post #16
11 January 2006, 22:36 UTC#16
QUOTE(funk master steven @ Jan 11 2006, 11:33 PM) [snapback]264285[/snapback]

QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 10:30 PM) [snapback]264283[/snapback]

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:29 PM) [snapback]264281[/snapback]

I know...so does his rule apply to everyone or what? I dont understand how it could work.

Would only apply for Americans. George Bush doesn't rule the world, despite what he might think.


But like how would it work.

man 1 : dude you got your head so far up your ass, and on that note my name is man 1 and live in al's fictisiouse mind
man 2: dude your a dumbass and deserve an ass kicking, man 2 al's fictisiouse mind



Apparently you need to supply your full name when insulting someone, otherwise they can investigate you.

QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 11:35 PM) [snapback]264286[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 11:33 PM) [snapback]264284[/snapback]

QUOTE(Rob - DR - @ Jan 11 2006, 11:27 PM) [snapback]264280[/snapback]

QUOTE(Joe. @ Jan 11 2006, 11:26 PM) [snapback]264279[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]264277[/snapback]

Bush signed it as part of the patriot act. It's utterly retarded, people have the right to express their point of view without revealing their identities. What annoys me more is no American has the balls to oppose these stupid new laws.

So as this law is for the internet, and it's from america, do we have to do it? like are we supposed to, or if we have an argument with an American do they have to tell us and we can just laugh at them?


Erm the internet is not American.



Actually America does categorically own root records for domains. However, no one really owns the internet, the internet is basically a massive network.


The internet was born in Sweden.

And I know, there'd be no way of enforcing it. It's stupid. It's moronic. It's George Bush.



Maybe so, however the UK was the first to discover broadband. GO ENGALAND, ENGALAND ENGLAND ENGLAAAAND.

Haha.
post #17
11 January 2006, 22:41 UTC#17
Haha, fuck em. I'm Wilbur, I don't give a shit.

p.s. check your PMs gman :wink:
post #18
11 January 2006, 22:43 UTC#18
QUOTE(Wilbur @ Jan 11 2006, 11:41 PM) [snapback]264293[/snapback]

Haha, fuck em. I'm Wilbur, I don't give a shit.

p.s. check your PMs gman :wink:



Checked them, and decided I'll do it on the weekend. I'm too tired to be arsed now :D
post #19
11 January 2006, 22:58 UTC#19
Anyone seen them AOL adverts in England? I thought it was a show but its only online... It kinda talks about this in it.
post #20
11 January 2006, 22:59 UTC#20
QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 11:58 PM) [snapback]264319[/snapback]

Anyone seen them AOL adverts in England? I thought it was a show but its only online... It kinda talks about this in it.



What do they say?
post #21
11 January 2006, 23:09 UTC#21
So basically if I call Gaz A homo, ill have to say my full name.


Alex Ralph Bustard

( not my real name tee hee, im such a rebel )
post #22
11 January 2006, 23:55 UTC#22
you gotta be fucking kidding me. I just looked into this and it's true. I dont fucking believe it. That's unconstitutional. That violates our 1st amendment rights. What the fuck is this country coming to.

George Bush is the fucking terrorist. We go to war to protect our freedom. Then our faggot president takes away our basic freedoms. He deserves to be executed. Fuck him. Im gonna laugh my ass off when he gets assassinated.

What the fuck is wrong with our country. How can be so fucking stupid elect this douche bag to be president. Then watch him fuck our country up and down, and then elect him for a 2nd term?!?!

I fucking piss on everyone who voted for this fuck. He's created a pointless law that will be impossible to enforce without spending millions of dollars.

Who decides what is annoying and whats not? Great, another fucking law that soley relies on matter of opinion.

FUCK THIS SHIT.
post #23
12 January 2006, 00:26 UTC#23
I agree. The fucked up thing is that if the government decides its a matter of "national security" they can bypass all legal processes and basically do whatever they want and that’s the basis of the patriot act. I didn’t vote for Bush, but now he’s in his second term, he has nothing to lose...no chance of reelection, so he can do whatever he wants. Its shit.
post #24
12 January 2006, 00:52 UTC#24
Canada is training assassins as ws speak.... G.W.B will be no more in 23 1/2 days... Consider it a gift from Paul Martin
post #25
12 January 2006, 01:06 UTC#25
QUOTE(dgodlewski @ Jan 12 2006, 12:26 AM) [snapback]264356[/snapback]

I agree. The fucked up thing is that if the government decides its a matter of "national security" they can bypass all legal processes and basically do whatever they want and that’s the basis of the patriot act. I didn’t vote for Bush, but now he’s in his second term, he has nothing to lose...no chance of reelection, so he can do whatever he wants. Its shit.


Dan, do you know if this shit for real? As in a law that will actually be enforced? I cant even imagine how this would work. According to this website, anonymously annoying someone is a federal crime, does that mean the FBI will handle it? How ridiculous...the FBI wasting their time on something so petty.

Here is the site - http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,..._3-6022491.html
post #26
12 January 2006, 01:14 UTC#26
QUOTE(WEAK @ Jan 12 2006, 02:06 AM) [snapback]264374[/snapback]

QUOTE(dgodlewski @ Jan 12 2006, 12:26 AM) [snapback]264356[/snapback]

I agree. The fucked up thing is that if the government decides its a matter of "national security" they can bypass all legal processes and basically do whatever they want and that’s the basis of the patriot act. I didn’t vote for Bush, but now he’s in his second term, he has nothing to lose...no chance of reelection, so he can do whatever he wants. Its shit.


Dan, do you know if this shit for real? As in a law that will actually be enforced? I cant even imagine how this would work. According to this website, anonymously annoying someone is a federal crime, does that mean the FBI will handle it? How ridiculous...the FBI wasting their time on something so petty.

Here is the site - http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,..._3-6022491.html


I don’t see how the feds would enforce this at all. The FBI has much bigger things to take care of then this, such as bank robberies and terrorism. The thing this is prolly linked most to is spamming and an attempt to stop it. Yes it is a real law from my understanding but its basically un-enforceable. Like many states have laws against oral sex... how do you enforce that. I will look more into this and see what I can find.
post #27
12 January 2006, 01:16 UTC#27
Yeah I couldnt find much on it. I wasnt sure what phrases to search on google, I just came up with the same article over and over. Let me know if you find anything.
post #28
12 January 2006, 01:33 UTC#28
I dont think it will work... Its prob just a law to fuck over people who they cant arrest anyother way. I guess everyone abuses someone on forums sometime or another... so this way they can fuck you over.

It is a waste of cash and cant really be done... and the US dont own the damn internet anyway... they just think they do.
post #29
12 January 2006, 01:35 UTC#29
QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 12 2006, 01:33 AM) [snapback]264392[/snapback]

I dont think it will work... Its prob just a law to fuck over people who they cant arrest anyother way. I guess everyone abuses someone on forums sometime or another... so this way they can fuck you over.

It is a waste of cash and cant really be done... and the US dont own the damn internet anyway... they just think they do.


And on that note you owe me 15.00 dollars for that post. And non of your fucking pounds either, real money.
post #30
12 January 2006, 01:49 UTC#30
lol. but if I gave you 15.00 pounds you would be richer