Forum index / General Chat / Attacks on Ebaumsworld

Attacks on Ebaumsworld

34 posts · page 1 of 2

post #1
11 January 2006, 07:28 UTC#1
Article

QUOTE
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006 3:15 A.M.
-----------------------------

For the last 36-48 hours, ebaumsworld.com has been the victim of a global cyber-terrorism attack allegedly conducted by an alliance of webmasters and their followers who disagree with our company's editorial process (See FAQ below). The attack has come in several forms including:
-a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack;
-Malicious attempts at gaining access to restricted parts of the site;
-Spamming our forum and chat rooms;
-Hacking into admin restricted accounts;

There have also been numerous personal threats made against individual eBaum's World staff members. Most recently, our physical Corporate Headquarters building was vandalized so we've been forced to hire on-site security personnel. We have also opened the dialogue with our local police cyber-crime unit which works very closely with the FBI in matters like this.

We have been working diligently day and night to reduce any ill effect these attacks may have on our users, but you may experience some technical problems or annoyances while you view the site until we finish the ongoing criminal investigation. Please bear with us during this time and rest assured we will be back at 100% very soon.

We want to thank all the people who have helped us through these last few days, especially the other websites and forums that contributed what they could, you know who you are.


I see this as a good thing.
post #2
11 January 2006, 07:47 UTC#2
yup, 1337 h4x0rz.
post #3
11 January 2006, 08:38 UTC#3
I <3 the h4x0rz
post #5
11 January 2006, 11:40 UTC#5
BRING THOSE FUCKERS DOWN...............
post #6
11 January 2006, 11:52 UTC#6
QUOTE(womp @ Jan 11 2006, 08:38 AM) [snapback]263825[/snapback]

I <3 the h4x0rz

post #7
11 January 2006, 12:38 UTC#7
his fault for stealing material
post #8
11 January 2006, 14:25 UTC#8
HAHHA nOICe
post #9
11 January 2006, 14:38 UTC#9
Nice how theives get help from the F.B.I.
post #10
11 January 2006, 16:24 UTC#10
Thats awesome.

Down with eBaums.
post #11
11 January 2006, 17:12 UTC#11
I have no sympathy.
post #12
11 January 2006, 17:14 UTC#12
Its finally time someone beat up ebaum, lol @ there hq getting vandalized
post #13
11 January 2006, 17:16 UTC#13
Haha, sweeeeet. Fuck ebaums.
post #14
11 January 2006, 17:16 UTC#14
I heard about this in IRC last week sometime. Never knew it woul dwork though. But I bet its got them alot more hits and interest so it will prob work out as a good thing.

But I do think they suck
post #15
11 January 2006, 17:17 UTC#15
QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:16 PM) [snapback]263964[/snapback]

I heard about this in IRC last week sometime. Never knew it woul dwork though. But I bet its got them alot more hits and interest so it will prob work out as a good thing.

But I do think they suck



Doubt it, their site is slow as fuck most of the time now so they are probably losing hits and if the attacks carry they may be forced to null route the site for a while.
post #16
11 January 2006, 17:18 UTC#16
They will get around it some how. There are alot of good scripts about now. I used to help out on a forum that was ddosed loads and thet got around it. Shame there gone now though
post #17
11 January 2006, 17:22 UTC#17
QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]263971[/snapback]

They will get around it some how. There are alot of good scripts about now. I used to help out on a forum that was ddosed loads and thet got around it. Shame there gone now though



You can never really fully stop a DDoS saturating a line, scripts are okay to stop any damaging packets from reaching the server but when a line is being pinged by hundreds of PCs, it will always saturate the lines as long as the server is responding to pings, which it needs to for the site to function then it is always susceptible. They may implement a hardware solution, but even this isn't perfect.
post #18
11 January 2006, 17:25 UTC#18
QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 06:22 PM) [snapback]263975[/snapback]

QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]263971[/snapback]

They will get around it some how. There are alot of good scripts about now. I used to help out on a forum that was ddosed loads and thet got around it. Shame there gone now though



You can never really fully stop a DDoS saturating a line, scripts are okay to stop any damaging packets from reaching the server but when a line is being pinged by hundreds of PCs, it will always saturate the lines as long as the server is responding to pings, which it needs to for the site to function then it is always susceptible. They may implement a hardware solution, but even this isn't perfect.

yeah. I know... I used to ddos some sites way bacl.... always a good way to fuck with people. but I am sure the ywill be fine
post #19
11 January 2006, 17:28 UTC#19
QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:25 PM) [snapback]263981[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 06:22 PM) [snapback]263975[/snapback]

QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]263971[/snapback]

They will get around it some how. There are alot of good scripts about now. I used to help out on a forum that was ddosed loads and thet got around it. Shame there gone now though



You can never really fully stop a DDoS saturating a line, scripts are okay to stop any damaging packets from reaching the server but when a line is being pinged by hundreds of PCs, it will always saturate the lines as long as the server is responding to pings, which it needs to for the site to function then it is always susceptible. They may implement a hardware solution, but even this isn't perfect.

yeah. I know... I used to ddos some sites way bacl.... always a good way to fuck with people. but I am sure the ywill be fine



Did you do it for fun, or out of spite?
post #20
11 January 2006, 17:28 UTC#20
they're fags, they're all like "yeah if you contact us we'll delete your video or give you credit".. no it should be the other way around "we will post your video as long as we give you credit or have contacted you"..
post #21
11 January 2006, 17:29 UTC#21
QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 06:28 PM) [snapback]263982[/snapback]

QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:25 PM) [snapback]263981[/snapback]

QUOTE(gman @ Jan 11 2006, 06:22 PM) [snapback]263975[/snapback]

QUOTE(Doyle @ Jan 11 2006, 06:18 PM) [snapback]263971[/snapback]

They will get around it some how. There are alot of good scripts about now. I used to help out on a forum that was ddosed loads and thet got around it. Shame there gone now though



You can never really fully stop a DDoS saturating a line, scripts are okay to stop any damaging packets from reaching the server but when a line is being pinged by hundreds of PCs, it will always saturate the lines as long as the server is responding to pings, which it needs to for the site to function then it is always susceptible. They may implement a hardware solution, but even this isn't perfect.

yeah. I know... I used to ddos some sites way bacl.... always a good way to fuck with people. but I am sure the ywill be fine



Did you do it for fun, or out of spite?

You know me G.... I was bord
post #22
11 January 2006, 17:38 UTC#22
Ebaums is cool. It's a nerd war. Nerds suck meaning Ebaums are cool.
post #23
11 January 2006, 18:11 UTC#23
QUOTE(chris_fragile @ Jan 11 2006, 05:38 PM) [snapback]263992[/snapback]

Ebaums is cool. It's a nerd war. Nerds suck meaning Ebaums are cool.

Yeah I'd love to have my content stolen from me too without recognition.
post #24
11 January 2006, 18:13 UTC#24
If you emailed them would they give credit? Or is that not the case..
post #25
11 January 2006, 21:39 UTC#25
everyone on that site is feministic anyhow, I remember how they reacted towards durans video. all trying to boycott the activity happening in the video like they have some high moral standards over something they can't do about but laugh.
post #26
11 January 2006, 21:42 UTC#26
QUOTE(wkh @ Jan 11 2006, 11:40 AM) [snapback]263856[/snapback]

BRING THOSE FUCKERS DOWN...............

post #27
11 January 2006, 21:44 UTC#27
We should help. :tongue:
post #28
11 January 2006, 22:50 UTC#28
QUOTE(adEm @ Jan 11 2006, 04:39 PM) [snapback]264210[/snapback]

everyone on that site is feministic anyhow, I remember how they reacted towards durans video. all trying to boycott the activity happening in the video like they have some high moral standards over something they can't do about but laugh.



yeah... I was like wtf.

but when it comes to those emo girls singing that "im emo" song, its all "omg those chicks are h0t!"
post #29
11 January 2006, 22:58 UTC#29
QUOTE(adEm @ Jan 11 2006, 10:39 PM) [snapback]264210[/snapback]

everyone on that site is feministic anyhow, I remember how they reacted towards durans video. all trying to boycott the activity happening in the video like they have some high moral standards over something they can't do about but laugh.



Feministic? Girls don't belong on the internet :happy:
post #30
11 January 2006, 23:11 UTC#30
yeah well, they act like 13 year old girls.