24 October 2004, 16:31 UTC#1
Something was brought to my attention... No more bumping topics that are over a month old. These topics can only be bumped if it is absolutely neccessary, it is up to the admods to decide what is neccessary and first offenses will be banned for around a week. Hopefully we wont have to deal with second offenders.
24 October 2004, 17:42 UTC#2
Haha, awesome.
24 October 2004, 18:28 UTC#3
This is a good rule.
24 October 2004, 18:34 UTC#4
i thought this was already a rule!?
24 October 2004, 18:37 UTC#5
what's wrong with bringing back an old topic?
24 October 2004, 18:49 UTC#6
because if it went a month without a post.. then it died for a reason.
24 October 2004, 19:07 UTC#7
Gutting andy, but I don't see what's so wrong with bumping?
24 October 2004, 19:09 UTC#8
People don-t like to see old shit dragged up I guess.
24 October 2004, 19:18 UTC#9
I suppose but itisn't killing anybody or takin up memory or anything along those lines just a thought that's all
24 October 2004, 20:27 UTC#10
I emphasized this rule because the recent bumping of old topics were with response such as "this doesnt work"........ Things that didnt need to be stated and were the obvious reasons of why the topic was dead...
24 October 2004, 22:36 UTC#11
I think you should be allowed to bump a topic if you have something useful and relavent to add. But I don't care either way.
24 October 2004, 23:32 UTC#12
QUOTE Something was brought to my attention... No more bumping topics that are over a month old.
These topics can only be bumped if it is absolutely neccessary, it is up to the admods to decide what is neccessary and first offenses will be banned for around a week. Hopefully we wont have to deal with second offenders.
25 October 2004, 02:33 UTC#13
I'm just clarifying things.
25 October 2004, 02:45 UTC#14
haha i kno dude.
25 October 2004, 13:08 UTC#15
for fucks sake people, i thought i'd intruded on a mothers' meeting for all the bitching going on.
imho : although this isn't neccesarily a bad rule, i don't think this forum is popular or busy enough to start talking about 'code of conduct' type stuff quite yet.
and anyway, whats wrong with adding a possible new dimension or opinion to an existing topic? That's what message boards are about and in a still developing board such as HGF, the more new opinions and content, the better.
27 October 2004, 00:56 UTC#16
QUOTE (tomilious @ Oct 25 2004, 01:08 PM) for fucks sake people, i thought i'd intruded on a mothers' meeting for all the bitching going on.
imho : although this isn't neccesarily a bad rule, i don't think this forum is popular or busy enough to start talking about 'code of conduct' type stuff quite yet.
and anyway, whats wrong with adding a possible new dimension or opinion to an existing topic? That's what message boards are about and in a still developing board such as HGF, the more new opinions and content, the better.
Haha, you crack me up.
28 October 2004, 21:06 UTC#17
awesome rule. I support it.
28 October 2004, 23:30 UTC#18
Bumping should be allowed, and incouraged. It keeps similar information all in one viewable topic, rather than scattered throughout the site.
The only reason anyone would want bumping banned, would be so they could see their little site get bigger. Don't worry about this, as a forum does not need to be huge to be good.
I think its a better idea to forget size, and focus on quality. I, personaly would want to see one topic on 'what camera you use', 'your favorite jackass stunt', rather than a new one made every month. Focussing on 'CKY forums' for example, the amount of new topics is rediculous. Nobody even bothers to look at them, so you get thousands of, 'do you love BAM?' threads, literaly.
I'm sure 'tomilious' and others will agree.
Go on gazaa, tell me 'Haha, you crack me up' . Rather than read what I have taken the time to type, and reply in a senisble manner. Don't give a pathetic reply, and try and reply with more than 5 words.
29 October 2004, 00:06 UTC#19
I posted this rule in reference to a topic about a clip being released where the link was broken, around 2 months later someone comes around and says "This doesnt work"...
If its good conversation go for it...
29 October 2004, 00:12 UTC#20
So really just use your initiative and common sense. I see what the Bubba means and makes sense. So for the tards out there (my bruv) wise up really.
29 October 2004, 00:14 UTC#21
My last post was because bubba was correct.
29 October 2004, 00:16 UTC#22
I get you fenix.
You're basicly talking about some rarities then, where people reply inappropriately.
But, is it ok, if people bump sesibly?
29 October 2004, 02:16 UTC#23
QUOTE Go on gazaa, tell me 'Haha, you crack me up' . Rather than read what I have taken the time to type, and reply in a senisble manner. Don't give a pathetic reply, and try and reply with more than 5 words.
Bah, shut up.
I said tom cracked me up.
Not you.
Lick my crack y0
29 October 2004, 10:30 UTC#24
1 word reply...
Burned!
29 October 2004, 16:28 UTC#25
QUOTE I'm sure 'tomilious' and others will agree.
exactly the point I was trying to get across.
29 October 2004, 20:48 UTC#26
QUOTE (tomilious @ Oct 29 2004, 04:28 PM)
QUOTE I'm sure 'tomilious' and others will agree.
exactly the point I was trying to get across.
CHUT UP
29 October 2004, 21:03 UTC#27
Spelt shut wrong
29 October 2004, 21:08 UTC#28
on purpose may I add
29 October 2004, 21:51 UTC#29
BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAA, you dislexic fiend gazaa!
29 October 2004, 22:11 UTC#30
Hahaha what an idiyot!!!