Read-only historical archive Reconstructed community archive · captured 17 November 2010

Forum index / Computers / NEW Blindfusion site

NEW Blindfusion site

17 posts · page 1 of 1

Matt M
post #1
07 May 2005, 21:18 UTC#1
Hey,

We have finally made the basics of a new blindfusion site, but we need to know what to add, take away ect. and you guys seem pretty good at suggesting that type of stuff..

New blindfusion

Tell us what you think.

Cheers.



Mono
post #2
07 May 2005, 21:49 UTC#2
All looks good to me.

One question? How do you actually purchase a package? Or is that part of the site not up yet?

Anyways, layout is simple and clean. Good job.
YATES
post #3
07 May 2005, 22:44 UTC#3
its pretty!
Matt M
post #4
08 May 2005, 11:54 UTC#4
QUOTE (M0N0 @ May 7 2005, 09:49 PM) One question? How do you actually purchase a package? Or is that part of the site not up yet?

Yeah that bit isnt up yet, we wanted to wait till we have got the layout just how we want it, then start to add the content..

Cheers for the comments :)
Ding_Dong
post #5
08 May 2005, 12:03 UTC#5
looks pro
broken silence
post #6
08 May 2005, 12:42 UTC#6
looks ok.. depends on wht u put in I guess..
Matt M
post #7
08 May 2005, 16:12 UTC#7
QUOTE (broken silence @ May 8 2005, 12:42 PM) looks ok.. depends on wht u put in I guess..

What do you mean by that?
gman
post #8
08 May 2005, 16:31 UTC#8
Looking fucking awesome
Matt M
post #9
08 May 2005, 17:45 UTC#9
Cheers gman, you probs know what we are going through, I find it hard to make sites like this.. improvments?
gman
post #10
08 May 2005, 21:12 UTC#10
QUOTE (Matt M @ May 8 2005, 07:45 PM) Cheers gman, you probs know what we are going through, I find it hard to make sites like this.. improvments?

I love it apart from the navigation buttons are pixelised a lot, work on that and its pretty much perfect. You may want to think of a better logo also, as the current doesn't define much.
kuffi
post #11
08 May 2005, 21:17 UTC#11
hey man thats a lot better than the previous design, good job.

2 very small things tho:
- NRB DESK or whatever it says.. I think Base02 isnt the right font to use there :)
- The text at the button can be a bit bigger.

thats all :P
tomm
post #12
08 May 2005, 21:23 UTC#12
sexy graphics matt <3
Matt M
post #13
08 May 2005, 21:25 UTC#13
QUOTE (gman @ May 8 2005, 09:12 PM) I love it apart from the navigation buttons are pixelised a lot, work on that and its pretty much perfect. You may want to think of a better logo also, as the current doesn't define much.

I think we shall have to chnage the links to png then, silly jpg quality..

And yeah I agree with the logo, but I think thats something that may need to develope over time..

QUOTE 2 very small things tho:
- NRB DESK or whatever it says.. I think Base02 isnt the right font to use there :)
- The text at the button can be a bit bigger.


The base 2 is because thats the stype of the NRB site, so its like representing that site kidna thing.. but yeah it does look quite weird..

.. and what text do you mean, the text in general?
alee
post #14
10 May 2005, 17:07 UTC#14
yep, I made that.

The JPG quality is low on the rollover navigation because I dont want ANY delay on the loading when they go over it, but I agree that the quality should be a bit better.
gman
post #15
10 May 2005, 17:13 UTC#15
QUOTE (alee @ May 10 2005, 07:07 PM) yep, I made that.

The JPG quality is low on the rollover navigation because I dont want ANY delay on the loading when they go over it, but I agree that the quality should be a bit better.

Why not use the preload function for the images then?
kuffi
post #16
10 May 2005, 17:47 UTC#16
QUOTE (Matt M @ May 8 2005, 09:25 PM) .. and what text do you mean, the text in general?

oh sorry I meant bottem instead of button :)
alee
post #17
11 May 2005, 17:00 UTC#17
QUOTE (gman @ May 10 2005, 05:13 PM) QUOTE (alee @ May 10 2005, 07:07 PM) yep, I made that.

The JPG quality is low on the rollover navigation because I dont want ANY delay on the loading when they go over it, but I agree that the quality should be a bit better.

Why not use the preload function for the images then?

yeah I thought someone would say that, I am lazy. I may do that

Anyways, cya later people