Why intel Suck

Ok, the regular user will probably have stuffed inside there box a p4 processor, but do we actually believe they are the best? AMD is proven to outperform pentium vastly, so a 1700 MHZ amd will probably perform better that a 2600 mhz p4, and because amd concentrate on the quality off there actual chips, although amds have al ower clock speed ratio, they will out perform pentium anyday. This brings us to the conclusion that those shitty p4's that the majority of you have in your box arnt as good as they may seem.

...Are you gonna be ok?....Do you want some hot chocolate?

I have an AMD, too bad it's only 800 MhZ.

I use p4 w/hyperthreading...seems to work fine.....

I like my computer.

What kind do you use chris?

I have 2 of them. One for video and the other for shitty shit.

The shitty shit one is a 2 year old dell. 256mb ram 40gb hard drive and 2.0ghz processor.

the good one is a sony viao and its got 512mb ram 120gb hard drive and a 2.6ghz processor

I only edit on the sony cayse i dont feel like buying a capture card for my dell.

QUOTE I use p4 w/hyperthreading...seems to work fine.....

I've used both for editing video and from expecience i thought that p4 was more stable External image not preserved — inspect source: http://homegrownforums.com/forums/html/emoticons/blahblah.gif Thats just my opinion

QUOTE (Chris @ Jul 1 2004, 02:46 PM) I've used both for editing video and from expecience i thought that p4 was more stable External image not preserved — inspect source: http://homegrownforums.com/forums/html/emoticons/blahblah.gif Thats just my opinion

Well james also agreed with me so nyah!

QUOTE I never said they didnt work fine, I just said amd is better