11 March 2005, 17:17 UTC#1
Hypotheticly, lets say a big company wanted to put out a homegrown compilation dvd of all the best footage. 75% of the profits are split among the groups according to percent of their footage in the movie. everyone would get plugs for their websites and their dvds would be sold through the site. BUT they want to call it something like "fuck a job"
Would you want your group in the movie?
11 March 2005, 17:19 UTC#2
is this niolan??? thats shit if it is
dont go for that shit
11 March 2005, 17:21 UTC#3
that name is lame because to make homegrown movies you need "money" and you get "money" from "jobs" so saying fuck a job then putting out a video that cost money to make...well you see the point.
11 March 2005, 17:43 UTC#4
it would be a good deal for groups with a few clips of good footage and not enough to fill a dvd, but not so good for groups with alot of footage when they could be making alot more on a dvd deal, the title sucks just because it sucks they should make it cooler, is there any particular reason you asked anyway
11 March 2005, 17:59 UTC#5
duran likes to think to much and is a kid with the "what if" and "what would happend if" and cant forget the classic "would you do this if"
but hes puttin his mind to good use in videos now
11 March 2005, 18:41 UTC#6
Wouldnt this be good, is there something like that happening?
11 March 2005, 22:32 UTC#7
save your allowance and make your own video... save your artisic control, and dignity ( if you had any)
11 March 2005, 22:33 UTC#8
im gonna pretend I didnt double post for fuck sakes
11 March 2005, 22:37 UTC#9
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 11 2005, 11:33 PM) im gonna pretend I didnt double post for fuck sakes
what are you talking about, I didnt see you double post. Did anyone?
11 March 2005, 22:41 UTC#10
I did.
12 March 2005, 00:48 UTC#11
So did I... what are you blind?
12 March 2005, 07:46 UTC#12
Actually there is a reason I asked. so id apreciate yes or no answers with a reason.
12 March 2005, 09:22 UTC#13
QUOTE (Dan @ Mar 11 2005, 10:37 PM)
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 11 2005, 11:33 PM) im gonna pretend I didnt double post for fuck sakes
what are you talking about, I didnt see you double post. Did anyone?
yes ... and yes are you blind ?
12 March 2005, 12:20 UTC#14
QUOTE (Duran @ Mar 12 2005, 07:46 AM) Actually there is a reason I asked. so id apreciate yes or no answers with a reason.
whats the reason, has someone offered you a deal for your footage, because if we step out of the realm of hipothetic situations and you gave us the "scoop" we might be able to lend some more knowlege on the subject
12 March 2005, 12:34 UTC#15
I wouldn't care as long as the payment and production of the video would be good.. I wouldnt care much about the name, I'd tell them it would be better to rename it tho
12 March 2005, 12:59 UTC#16
QUOTE (Duran @ Mar 11 2005, 05:17 PM) Hypotheticly, lets say a big company wanted to put out a homegrown compilation dvd of all the best footage. 75% of the profits are split among the groups according to percent of their footage in the movie. everyone would get plugs for their websites and their dvds would be sold through the site. BUT they want to call it something like "fuck a job"
Would you want your group in the movie?
I think that's a nice ideia, I would like to participate if that was true! But I didn't like the name, but fuck that.
*by the way we are going to buy a good cam now
12 March 2005, 13:06 UTC#17
not one group but all of us. a huge compilation with everygroups best footage. and lets leave it at hypothetical for now.
12 March 2005, 16:17 UTC#18
When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
13 March 2005, 00:14 UTC#19
^word
13 March 2005, 07:29 UTC#20
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 12 2005, 04:17 PM) When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
W3RDiEZ
13 March 2005, 09:57 UTC#21
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 07:29 AM)
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 12 2005, 04:17 PM) When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
W3RDiEZ
WTF, you wanted people to pay you to edit their videos...
Your such a hypodrite (sp?) faggot.
13 March 2005, 10:01 UTC#22
hypocrite?
13 March 2005, 10:44 UTC#23
QUOTE (M0N0 @ Mar 13 2005, 09:57 AM)
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 07:29 AM)
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 12 2005, 04:17 PM) When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
W3RDiEZ
WTF, you wanted people to pay you to edit their videos...
Your such a hypodrite (sp?) faggot.
13 March 2005, 10:49 UTC#24
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 10:44 AM)
QUOTE (M0N0 @ Mar 13 2005, 09:57 AM)
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 07:29 AM)
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 12 2005, 04:17 PM) When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
W3RDiEZ
WTF, you wanted people to pay you to edit their videos...
Your such a hypodrite (sp?) faggot.
Yeah, cause your a shit editor.
QUOTE hypocrite?
13 March 2005, 10:55 UTC#25
QUOTE (M0N0 @ Mar 13 2005, 10:49 AM)
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 10:44 AM)
QUOTE (M0N0 @ Mar 13 2005, 09:57 AM)
QUOTE (Veni Vearl @ Mar 13 2005, 07:29 AM)
QUOTE (DanG @ Mar 12 2005, 04:17 PM) When you give someone your footage you lose all control over whats done with it. To some people that's more important than a couple dollars.
W3RDiEZ
WTF, you wanted people to pay you to edit their videos...
Your such a hypodrite (sp?) faggot.
Yeah, cause your a shit editor.
if im shit then your fucking ten times worse! u cant even edit u fuckin show-off wannabe asshole
13 March 2005, 11:00 UTC#26
Come back and wreck me when you got pubic hair you squeeky voiced cunt.
13 March 2005, 11:12 UTC#27
bk
13 March 2005, 11:35 UTC#28
bk? wtf.
13 March 2005, 11:57 UTC#29
burger king
13 March 2005, 12:11 UTC#30
lol
actually bk means back u dull shit
(im talking to m0n0)
