Forum index / Media & Music / Casino Royale

Casino Royale

17 posts · page 1 of 1

post #2
15 October 2006, 21:02 UTC#2
Saw the trailer in the movie house. Looks sick tbh.

This is meant to be the most "realistic" and dark Bond film yet...by that I mean he doesn't do as much logic-defying shit like having an invisible car or magnet boots so he can walk on the celing.
post #3
15 October 2006, 21:11 UTC#3
pierce was co0l..... snif snif
post #4
15 October 2006, 21:19 UTC#4
Pierce spent years complaining about how it's just about stupid toys in it, and the writers were ignoring the plot.

So they sacked him and did what he said hah.

Pierce was mint.
post #6
15 October 2006, 21:58 UTC#6
< Goldeneye.
post #7
16 October 2006, 04:28 UTC#7
I still don't think Craig was a good choice for James Bond. Watching the trailer he looks like one of the bad guys. Well, we will see how the movie is.
post #8
16 October 2006, 08:56 UTC#8
Its like far too much of him flexing in the sea and little underwear for my liking. They are trying to appeal to women rather than appealing to the men by sticking some chick in a thong in there. THATS WHAT JAMES BOND WAS ALL ABOUT. Beating women, and shooting people.

That is all.
post #9
16 October 2006, 09:07 UTC#9
looks gay to be honest
post #10
16 October 2006, 09:40 UTC#10
hate bond movies
post #11
16 October 2006, 12:25 UTC#11
never really been a great fan of them either
post #12
16 October 2006, 13:35 UTC#12
Thats because you're all foreign. lol.
post #13
16 October 2006, 20:09 UTC#13
Yeah, that Craig bastard looks more like one of the bad guys than the good guys. I really think they couldve chosen a better Bond, but oh well. Im not going to go c it anyways, so it makes no difference to me lol.
post #14
16 October 2006, 20:30 UTC#14
Looks really really really good! I hope its more realistic!


Pierce is great in The Matador! really ace!




But seriously what bond movies are to me are the ones with Sean Connery and Roger Moore. They rule.

The new ones are... meh.. to much special effects... and explosions...
post #15
16 October 2006, 20:31 UTC#15
Damn, I used to be a huge fan of these, my dad used to take me to see them every time there was a new one out, did that for as long as I can remember.

I'll definately be seeing it, not too interested in it though, haha....... agree about the bond.
post #16
16 October 2006, 20:39 UTC#16
Pierce is our generations Bond. We gotta all adjust, imagine what our fathers were like when they recast Sean Connery. =z
post #17
16 October 2006, 21:01 UTC#17
That looked really good actually, quite looking forward to seeing it now. Noone will compare to Pierce though.